Sunday 8 December 2013

Motives for home education in this country



One of the things which triggered the report on home education by Graham Badman was that in the first decade of the present century, the numbers of children being educated at home appeared to be rising steeply.   Tens of thousands of children were not at school; what if this  continued, until hundreds of thousands of children were involved? So what, we may say! What business  would that have been of the government’s? There were two considerations. One was the natural and reprehensible desire of governments to regulate things for the sake of it. The other was that it was becoming pretty clear that many of those deregistering their children from school were doing so not because they felt that they could provide their children with a better education than the school, but because sending the kid to school was interfering with their own lifestyle. This is appalling; that  parents would place their own convenience above the opportunity for their children to receive a good education.  This tendency by home educators to embark upon home education as a matter of lifestyle, rather than for the benefit of their children’s education, has been widely noted; not least in surveys by organisations such as Education Otherwise. In one  survey,  conducted among all its two and a half thousand members in 2003, Education Otherwise found that a third of those who answered, said that the strongest influence upon their decision to home educate related to family lifestyle, rather than education.

This trend of avoiding sending children to school, purely because this accorded with some kind of ’alternative’ lifestyle, was worrying to many professionals in the field of education.  With number rising each year, it was felt that at the very least, some effort should be made to find out what was happening. Since 2009 though, the numbers of home educated children have first flattened out and are now declining. Because the problem is still limited to a relatively small number of children, compared with those in the schools system, the decision has been reached to leave home education alone. Of course, if the numbers began rising sharply again; that could all change.

For those who are now gnashing their teeth and denouncing me as a liar, I thought that it might prove interesting to look at a recent example of this kind of thing. On one of the largest of the internet lists for home educators, one with thousands of members, a woman posted recently about the question of what to do about her son’s education.  She has two sons. Both are home educated, but the older boy has recently expressed the desire to go to school. What are the mother’s concerns about this? What sort of things motivated her to educate her children at home in the first place? Let’s have a look;

 My  son has just decided that actually he quite likes the sound of school … I am thrown into complete disarray and terrified at the idea of having to help him find the right school, visit schools, sort out getting admission to a school and all the rest of the palaver this might involve…
I've been feeling in recent weeks how much more relaxed my life might be if both the boys were in school. This is all just reminding me of one of the reasons I chose to home educate in the first place - being tied to someone else's schedule (term dates, school hours, home work, etc.) which have the potential to completely rearrange our lives...

Readers will see at once that there is no mention at all of the child’s education! Neither in the initial post, nor in subsequent exchanges with others on the list, is education mentioned. The whole problem is framed in terms of the possible effect upon the mother’s own life. Somebody tells her of the risk of attracting attention from the local authority in the future, somebody else says something about social services. Education does not rate the least mention. It is perhaps significant that not one of the thousands of members on this, one of the largest of the home education lists, thought it worth asking whether this proposed change would provide the child with a better education. It was taken entirely as read that the important point was how school   would affect the mother, not how it might benefit or harm the child himself. Any further comment would be superfluous. It is this trend which worries many local authorities and causes them to press for regulation. They know, as do most readers here, that for many people who don’t send their children to school, education is not the most important feature of the scheme; it is all about the parents' own  convenience and lifestyle.

3 comments:

  1. "In one survey, conducted among all its two and a half thousand members in 2003, Education Otherwise found that a third of those who answered, said that the strongest influence upon their decision to home educate related to family lifestyle, rather than education."

    I think the picture might be more nuanced than you present it.

    I cannot speak on behalf of other home educators, but in our case, I would say that our family's lifestyle and values are the major reason why our children aren't going to school. However, we happen to view a high quality education and a love of learning as a major component of those very values we're hoping to pass on.

    I honestly don't see how one can divorce "lifestyle" from "education". There's a set of tools we want to equip our children with as part of their upbringing. That includes a strong academic base, but there's so much more that goes into that.

    Were I to be asked the chief reason we've chosen home education, I'd probably tick "family lifestyle" too. But that doesn't mean that our children aren't going to follow a rigorous academic programme. In case you wonder, we aren't "unschoolers", but are following the classical method. Our copy of "The Well-Trained Mind" is very well-thumbed!

    So in short, our lifestyle includes a high quality education that, we believe, will be superior to what our children would get in school. I suspect that there are others out there who think like we do.

    Elizabeth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'So in short, our lifestyle includes a high quality education that, we believe, will be superior to what our children would get in school. I suspect that there are others out there who think like we do.'

      This of course is quite true. neither I, nor the Department for Education, think that most home educators fall into the category which I describe above. Never the less, there are quite a few such people and as the numbers grew, there looked as though there were going to be quite a few more.

      Delete
  2. http://www.educationotherwise.net/attachments/article/151/Prospectus%20For%20Improving%20Support%20to%20Home%20Educating%20Families%200409.pdf

    I followed a link from your blog to this doc and the address for EO states that Education Otherwise Association Ltd
    PO Box 325
    Kings Lynn
    Norfolk, PE34 3XW
    www.education-otherwise.org
    Registered Charity No. 1055120

    is a limited company

    ReplyDelete